The 4th International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research for Sustainable Innovation (4th ICMRSI) was held successfully on April 16-17, April 2025. Organized by Universitas Persada Y.A.I. and and Research Synergy Foundation. this conference was held Virtual through the online platform.
This conference explore the intersection of basic principles with contemporary issues of Education, Economics, Business, and Society. The conference aims to establish a platform and to provide opportunities for academic scientists, researchers, research scholars, and practitioners from all over the world to exchange and share their experiences, ideas, knowledge and research results to the latest issues of various fields of science and technology to disseminate research that is being and has been carried out
The conference has successfully gathered speakers, participants, scientific reviewer, session chair, and attendees from more than 21+ countries around the globe, such as Indonesia, Malaysia, Germany, Philippines, India, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea, Thailand, United States, Sri Lanka, Morocco, Jordan, Egypt, Czech Republic, Pakistan, Australia, Algeria, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Ecuador, and many more.
In the session. With the list of presenters and research titles:
| Track Education | ||
| Paper ID | Presenter | Paper Title |
| MSI25148 | Wang Yanfang | A Comparative Study of Filial Piety Education in Chinese and Malaysian Textbooks: An Analysis of Political and Language Curriculum |
| MSI25153 | Kowiyah | The Effectiveness of Integrating GeoGebra into Project-Based Learning to Enhance Geometry Learning Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review |
| Track Humanities | ||
| Paper ID | Presenter | Paper Title |
| MSI25128 | Wijayanti | Marketing Communication Success Through Fandom Activities in the Music Industry |
| MSI25132 | Dwi Indah Kartika | Local Wisdom Approach in Regional Autonomy as an Effort to Prevent Religious Conflict in Lombok Tengah, Nusa Tenggara Barat |
| MSI25144 | Bryan Kalbu Adhi | Processes and Obstacles in the Realization of the Tilapia Fish Farming Empowerment Program in Karyamukti Village |
Q1. (Usman Mohammed): “How do educational system in China and Malaysia incorporate filial piety into their curricula?”
Q2. (Dwi Indah Kartika): “How does the digital era, such as social media, technology affect the transmission and practice of filial piety among students in Chinese and Malay students?”
Q3. (NWU Jonah Badua): “How did you utilize the findings of your study?”
Q4. (Maurits Sipayung): “What do you think we can adopt from the results of research on populations outside of Chinese students? And how does it relate to their learning success?”
Q5. (HILTON VIC PAILMA): “Based on the qualitative findings of your study, what significant changes have you explored on filial piety and how it differs from the conventional definition of this Confucian principle?”
Q6. (Taufik Haerul): “From the results of your research, from family, school and community factors, which has the most influence on child development?”
Q7. (SITI RAHMA SARI_078): “1. To what extent is filial piety explicitly included in the official curriculum guidelines of China and Malaysia? 2. How do the political ideologies in each country shape the presentation of filial piety?”
Q8. (Elmunawir-Indonesia): “How do you account for potential regional or socioeconomic variations within each country that might also influence these communication patterns and cultural values, beyond the national education framework?”
Q9. (Charity Pagarigan): “Based on the results of your study specifically that of parent arrangements, what home-school collaboration intervention program you can recommend for school counselors to include in their school guidance program?”
Q10. (Jo-Ting Wei): “Among the three key implementation strategies identified (structured inquiry, peer collaboration, and teacher training), which appeared to have the most significant impact and why?”
Q11. (Maurits Sipayung): “From which countries or schools are the study databases used for this Literature Review and what are the general conclusions that can be applied, for example in Indonesia?”
Q12. (Ryan R. Pecson): “What is your insight regarding the use of PJiBL in interdisciplinary research?”
Q13. (Michael Gibaga): “How might these differences influence students' perceptions of family roles and societal expectations in both countries?”
Q14. (Maurits Sipayung): “How much chance does local culture from Indonesia or other countries in Asia have to compete or be on par with K-Pop from Korea? What should promoters of local artists do to be on par with K-Pop, while physical promotions such as CDs no longer attract the new generation?”
Q15. (Michael Gibaga): “To what extent do fan-driven activities influence artist’s chart success or record label interest?”
Q16. (Dr. Rechelle B. Sabalza-LGU Paranaque): “What inspired or motivated you to focus your research specifically on fandom activities as a tool for marketing communication, considering there are so many other topics you could have explored in this field?”
Q17. (Aninditya): “How this music including fandom can improve marketing communication?”
Q18. (Herminigildo Jr Laput): “How do fandom activities contribute to the success of marketing communication in the music industry, particularly in Indonesia?”
Q19. (Bambang Imam_YAI): “How does the face-to-face communication strategy help to overcome challenges like different perspectives, social jealousy, and low education levels? Is there any specific evaluation to measure how effective this communication approach is in achieving the goal of community empowerment?”
Q20. (Delia Evelyn Gaibor Sánchez): “How do educational disparities affect the effectiveness of development communication in rural communities?”
Q21. (Arie Rihardini Sundari): “How to overcome social jealousy obstacles in the field?”
Q22. (Delia Evelyn Gaibor Sánchez): “How can educational differences lead to challenges like jealousy in development communication?”
Q23. (Elisa Haryonugroho): “How do you manage a lack of trained extension staff to provide ongoing technical assistance and monitor the farms which can impede the success of the program?”
Q24. (Usman Mohammed):
“Q1. How can local wisdom be leveraged to promote interfaith dialogue and cooperation in regions with diverse religious background?
Q2. What role do traditional leaders and community elders play in mediating religious conflicts through local wisdom approach?
Q3. Can the integration of local wisdom into regional autonomy policies ensure social cohesion and reduce religious tension?”
Q25. (Torrion_Voltaire_B): “How effective are local wisdom-based approaches compared to formal government interventions in preventing or resolving religious conflicts?”
Q26. (Delia Evelyn Gaibor Sánchez): “How can local cultural wisdom gently guide communities towards peace in times of religious tension?”
Q27. (Teguh Rifandi): “Your team state that Nyongkolan is one of the conflict mediation way. However, Nyongkolan is often become the source of conflict in Lombok. Why is Nyongkolan stated as conflict mediation?”
We invite all participants to discuss or ask questions related to the material shared by the presenters in this forum. The presenter and the audience can continue the discussion in this forum. Enjoy the discussion, and see you at the upcoming conference at https://bit.ly/RSF-UpcomingConference
Replies