At the 2nd ICE-BEST Keynote Speaker Session, Prof. Ramayah Thurasamy from School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia, delivered a speech about "Publishing Papers with Rigor in Quantitative Research". The participants were all excited to learn new insights from Prof. Prof. Ramayah Thurasamy and are welcomed to share their insight or ask question in this forum:
1) rich paulo to -> What are the new trends in quantitative research?
2) M SALEH -> I am Muhammad Saleh from Muhammadiyah University of Technology, Jakarta, Indonesia. I want to ask Prof. Ramayah Thurasamy. How to interpret the results of quantitative data analysis accurately and objectively to support research conclusions that will be published?
3) Supriatiningsih -> Can research with primary data be combined with secondary data?
4) Fatma Julian -> iam Fadma julian sanie, from Muhammadiyah university of technology jakarta want to ask : Are there any limitations to Campbell's (1990) theoretical definition?
5) Erika Putri Yanti -> I am Erika Putri Yanti from muhammadiyah university of technology, jakarta, indonesia. I want to ask : To what extent is Campbell's (1990) definition of theory still relevant in the context of current scientific developments?
6) Ilza Febrina -> Dear Prof. Ramayah..Thank you for your insightful topic. I'm keen to understand better how to easily distinguish between the formative and reflective. I’ve heard that checking the correlation among indicators can be helpful, with higher correlations suggesting a formative construct. CMIIW, or are there other straightforward ways to identify them? Thank you Prof,
All audience are also welcome to ask question in this forum. Thank you.
Replies
How can researchers ensure that the instruments used in quantitative research are highly valid and reliable?
How can researchers ensure that the instruments used in quantitative research are highly valid and reliable?
Hello, I am Dian Ratna Sari, from Universitas Lampung. Here I have a question, related to quantitative research, how can we make a good description in "discussion" part of our paper so that we don't only explain the primary data that we got form the field research?
Hello, I am Dian Ratna Sari, from Universitas Lampung. Here I have a question,
Assalammu’alaikum Prof Ramayah, may Allah always bless you. Ameen. The topic is very interesting. I have a question to ask. What kind of research study that can have the highest amount of rigor? Looking forward for your explanation. Also thank you for moderator to presenting my question. Wassalam.